An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.
25 bits and zero AP is a lot different than 125 bits and their full turns. Sending extra names on short expeditions is easy fun and profitable. For a long expedition we are absolutely going to need to rely on Axe's general bonus plus artifacts and fun sized Forge name. See how we've repeatedly...
Sending multiple Names is kind of pointless, it's not like their general bonus stacks. Most likely we send Axe plus artifact Cherenkolt (zero bits, same lore levels added) to handle the book hunt. Artifact Cherenkolt gets to lend 9 total lore levels to every expedition he's sent on for zero...
I would also rather that not happen and voted for it not to happen. But our AP is limited and I want to establish saving mayor mare as "in the list of things that can be cut if we absolutely have to"
We're spending 1 Velvet AP on Baldomare SH and most likely 2 more on Grail and Moth Sacraments...
I almost wouldn't mind just letting Mayor Mare meet an unfortunate end rather than burn Mareinette AP on it next turn.... most likely we just spent Velvet social on it instead of Cheerilee
We have The Great Book Hunt and The Quest for Iotic Essence next turn, both of which are likely to be...
Wasting our bureaus extremely limited actions is the exact opposite of what we want to do. The wolf cult will never eat a bureau action, for better or worse.
Damn, the vote was trending too, a few hours could have peeled someone else off. Ah well, we got our extra day and almost got there.
Happy thanksgiving to all.
The QM literally said we would get a vote on how much to involve her. Freedom is the ONLY option where we tell Soft the things she needs to be told and have her in charge of her cult while knowing what she's doing.
This is wrong because we will get an explicit vote if we take this option on how much to involve her. We could take the infantalizing approach but we will also have the option to have her actually running the cult for real instead of sleepwalking into it under the manipulation of the stains. Its...
Our plan specifically called to study the Moth 3 artifact if we oneshot the book?
We specifically ordered the priority on purpose so that it would be a Study 1 book 1 artifact action if we got the moth book first try and a study 3 books action otherwise
This seems like a terrible idea. Soft needs to be told she has a cult! Freedom is the only option that has Velvet actually communicate "you have a cult, here's a guide on how to run an esoteric cult. I'm very proud of what you have accomplished and im happy to help you whip your minions into...
We are 4 turns away from having a cult at all with the Bureau. If you're so pessimistic on turns until All In then dont use the phrase "Another" cult, since this cult comes online faster than the one you dont think will be online at all. The entire reason we voted for a prisoner this turn is...
I should clarify that I don't think that the consequences of their actions will be undone, but that the Stains as ongoing effects will stop existing after Velvet dies or ascends. The text is very clear that if Velvet dies the Stains will stop existing, and ascending would follow the same logic...