An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.
It doesn't break SoD but it's also very much not in character or belivable for the soviets (other than Stalin) to go around murdering people like you propose.
I seem to have missed where they defended Stalin. Mind providing a link?
Which USSR? Stalin? Sure, but he wouldn't be massacring them for being Ume, he'd be massacring them because of his delusions about conspiracies and traitors.
USSR under more sane leadership? No, not any more than they went around slaughtering jews.
Not that I can't imagine lots of Ume running...
True.
That seems...unlikely. Historically lower stakes duals were still combat, just to "first blood" or even with blunted weapons or other limitations that ensured no one would get seriously hurt.
Those are quite useful in many cases, but when facing a group of infantry that doesn't break and...
Nope.
The way one became a noble is generally by getting together a crew who could fight and either getting organized and trained well enough to keep the other gang's away or serving some one else well enough they felt like rewarding you.
In the sense that if they are well trained and equipped...
Very true, but again the point is those nobles were running the show because they got a group of people together to train and fight, not because they could ride a horse.
The advantages an Ume has might let them become nobles, but even with those advantages it's highly unlikely.
A Lancer on his horse has a lot of those same advantages, and as noted will end up dead very quickly against trained and disciplined troops
There was a very brief period of that between when armor evolved to the point that worked and when missile weapons evolved to the point they could deal with...
This is wrong, or at least extremely misleading.
While it's true that a group of well trained and equiped warriors can easily (especially if they're disciplined and trained in fighting together) crush a rabble of poorly trained and equipped rabble, even if greatly outnumbered. What is not true...
Apparently so. My first reaction was that that's weird all the references I know of have charioteers as violent hooligans at best, poor gutter trash at worst. However after reading about the olympic games, and ancient horsemanship some more it becomes clear - theChariot races were not (unlike...
Fair enough, but the greek city states were as I noted quite exclusionary in general and very elitist. I'm not talking about the greek patriarchs treating Ume the same as they treated human women, just that they wouldn't treat Ume differently than they treat everyone who isn't them.
Also, now...
Sure, but
1)You don't do that on the first day or in assessments.
2)Lying about statistics is bad, for athletes it's VERY bad.
I doubt it. Not any more than they had a section for women or slaves. I agree with about the modern olympics, but given how elitist and exclusionary the greek...
Remember we're talking about the person who describes coming in second in multiple national competitions as "average" so I really wouldn't trust their definition of "average".
Two prroblems with this. First, while reducing the weight and thus increasing the distance she'd travel when both feet are off the ground, that is AFAIK a relatively small portion of the running time and thus the increase would be fairly minor overall (and possibly countered by the issues with...