Rules of the site - Necromancy

Reminds me of that one recent time on SV when I made a post on an active quest thread about a typo (a rather significant one admittedly)... in a years-old post, from a different thread (of the same quest), by a different QM.
If I didn't know that the thread was active, and that my post would be lost among dozens of others, I wouldn't have done that at all - even though SV doesn't technically have any rules against thread necromancy.

 

The minimum content requirements on a pseudo-necromantic post are laxer here than on, say, SB. (If memory serves, you basically have to be posting an update i you are posting into an old quest on SB).

All of the listed examples are much higher-content than, say, an analysis of quest events, and especially combined with the expectation many will have that requirements will be stricter, this creates the impression that the rule is more reatrictive than it is.

You could better convey the intent of the rule if you added an example that reflected somewhere around the minimum acceptable content.

Whether the reduction in clarifications, explanations and such is worth whatever hassles are involved in tweaking the wording of the rules is your call, though.