Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
If you wish to change your username, please ask via conversation to tehelgee instead of asking via my profile. I'd like to not clutter it up with such requests.
Haven't even read the posts after mine. Too annoyed with Enjou's pushing that we can't go back on previous decisions. Which is utterly ridiculous when this vote is itself going back on refusing ASC before.
Honestly I don't even really care about ASC or not. I don't expect it to even matter, but it's the same situation just one he lost the first time instead of won.
Fine, I just limit my responses because I'm in a pointless argument and I know it. Honestly I felt like torpedoes effectiveness against large ships really went against the point of larger ships being increasingly effective.
RKKV ships being so vulnerable to damage really makes little sense to me as well as it seems like you'd avoid making them bigger than the minimum size since the first person to get a clean hit wins anyway.
No I get it. He already set up in the past rather firmly that the major powers of the Kerak sector relied a lot on RKKV cruiser squadrons, so he doesn't want to change their main weapons. But I think that their defenses need to be effective for that to make sense.
If there's no defense against an 8km cruiser's RKKV and it will one hit any other cruiser. There's no point in making a 14km RKKV cruiser since an 8km cruiser stands just as much odds of killing it as the reverse.
Cruisers have to have effective defenses to justify building them so big.
Honestly I expect she is a bomb and she requested to be sent to some society that she could fuck up. But that sort of comment would be decried as paranoia in the thread.
Okay, I can't help but comment since some opinions hit close to home to me. But frankly, that's the sort of logic that at times makes it all to tempting to well... Drop out of a quest, and no longer follow it, for a player.
Then again, on the other side in glance look, having consequences that don't simply go away if not chosen, has it's own merits. Just means you have to ideally plan well on every single choice, which can sometimes be well... Bandwagon'd if not done quickly.
Now, this is making me think of how it's hard to do a slow thought up vote plan, compared to a quick improv plan that is meme filled.
Well if you really want to influence the planet results, maybe you could write an omake and then spend a fate point, assuming that system is still in effect.
Comments on Profile Post by Persimmon