A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
I get it, the problem is that given the conditions and the lack of hard clad proof in regards to AI use in works, it would be basically something that can only be enforced if you engaged in witch hunting.
Or instead, given the conditions, it would be a witch hunt.
Human feelings might indeed be that, but you know what also is immoral? Which I also believe the ones asking for such a tag are missing?
False accusations and punishments given to the innocent.
No amount of 'feelings' will ever justify it or all the evils in the world are justified
No, I do sustain that you just can't tell if something was generated by AI unless the case is extreme.
The same one you mocked did prove that, he wrote a fic, did the experiment saying an non generated work was generated, and people couldn't tell and assumed it was generated because he said...
The issue with that is that it creates a situation that is frankly absurd.
Suppose I inject the word 'A' or the phrase 'the birds flew across the tapestry of the heavens' into a machine, if they use those same words, it is plagiarism.
But that implies that if you used the words and the letter...
No? If anything I wanna see if they would extend to those as well.
It is the logical end of that inquiry.
But we know the crowd will just make some excuse for it and AI is the 'special case' where that inquiry fits...for some reason.
Anyway.
I don't care about AI for a reason. I have readed a fic, it was a Worm/Dune crossover, and up to a point I suspected it was AI generated.
Problem? I can't tell if it is truly AI generated since nobody seems to think that and so on. So I had two avenues of inquiry.
Assume the guy's...
For someone who keeps spouting 'ah buh this is different' merely to support a illogical position?
Sure, call it 'false equivalence'.
They did argue in the past that photography would kill painters, might as well see that they had a point, sure?
Suuuuuuuuure, and the sky is made of pigs. Excuse if I don't believe that line and that I believe you wouldn't be saying that if A.I didn't exist.
I will tell why you are saying that.
'Muh Jobs, I hate tech bros, artists got stolen'.
News at eleven. Intellectual Property is overrated and...
Then good luck proving people are using AI.
Nobody is going to tell and you will keep needing to hurl unproven accusations, which won't ever be proven and thus the consequences would be a ban because of 'I felt the vibes were BAD'.
The irony is, wanna solve your problem? Do as people did when...
Well, when people decide to try to shape the forum's policy to authorize a hostile attack, then you will see the crowd in favor of civility arguing against it.
Also no. AI usage might be lazy or tell that the person don't trust their own writing, but it isn't unethical. If AI usage is...
'Why do you do X?'
'For result X.'
The 'doing' would be a waste of time if you don't get the result. There is something that idea misses is that we trade time for EVERYTHING in life and you don't have much of it.
'The experience was the REWARD!'
Okay. Experience is paying the time wasted on...
...it has the same energy as 'let's kill science because science makes machines and kill human thought.'
I think we could just do like Dune and do eugenics to get Mentats, then I suppose they will be satisfied.
...of course, nobody would think about how creepy the creation of mentats are if you...
https://forum.questionablequesting.com/threads/the-american-prometheus-j-robert-oppenheimer-si.39649/
tags: ai assisted writing.
Like ratio first chapter.
116.
I think you are wrong. People don't seem to care if it came from an AI. Now, could that be used to kill off the fear of 'AI tag' in a...