• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Could there be multiple versions of you out there in a multiverse or is this one life all we have?

ScriptGenius12 said:
Discuss!
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Joke. Travel the multiverse and kill your alternate selves for power, Highlander-style. Condense your collective existence into a Prime Self and ascend to divinity.

Back on topic, effectively moot as each instance will likely have differing circumstances due to butterfly effect, in practice becoming wholly separate individuals. Unless some sort of metaphysical/spiritual "serial ID"/"fingerprint" exists to immutably link all these varying instances together as a common being, but that is a theological problem then.

Very volatile questions about free will and destiny if exists. If each timeline/universe has an already predestined timeline to ensure that no "self" is a 1:1 identical timeclone.

ADD: Also moral quagmire regarding morality of preserving poorer-performing instances of self, especially those with societal-detriment traits and/or circumstances. Possible argument for euthanasia. Example, Criminal Yous and whether to suffer them to live, or to put them down for the greater good?

ADD2: Imagine encountering the Magnum Opus iterations of yourself, either mundane brilliance and/or fortune, or outright fantastical birthrights. Hypothesise average human may not be able to pick themselves up off of the floor henceforth, witnessing exactly how much potential has been squandered.
 
Last edited:
Oth said:
Back on topic, effectively moot as each instance will likely have differing circumstances due to butterfly effect, in practice becoming wholly separate individuals. Unless some sort of metaphysical/spiritual "serial ID"/"fingerprint" exists to immutably link all these varying instances together as a common being, but that is a theological problem then.

Very volatile questions about free will and destiny if exists. If each timeline/universe has an already predestined timeline to ensure that no "self" is a 1:1 identical timeclone.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I go with the idea that ever variation of you that exists has infinite copys of such, and the only difference between each one is sublime background details that don`t change anything we would notice. Like one atom existing or not, or one meal being slightly over or under seasoned, shit we would forget instantly but is a "difference".
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top