• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Norse Mythology Reference Thread - The Whitest Has His Eye on You

Core Facts and Misinterpretations

Karmic Acumen

The long-suffering one
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
2,164
Likes received
99,278
Because I've grown fairly frustrated with the sheer, unrelenting and at times caricaturized misrepresentation of Norse mythology, folklore and culture everywhere in pop culture, I've decided to make my own reference material about what things are actually true there. And because this is the internet, you get to suffer the throes of enlightenment right along with me. Be honored, for you have been chosen!

I was ready to make this a fully referenced post, but then I found out that most of the scholarly material I hunted down piecemeal on the internet has already been consolidated here.

I'll go a fair bit beyond the stuff we find in the Eddas, like things from the sagas, and things from archaeological and anthropological sources, etc., like the ongoing reconstruction of languages from prehistoric Europe, for example. This is because there is a certain amount of context that has been consistently ignored by everyone interpreting or adapting Norse culture and myth, which has made pretty much every portrayal of anything Norse or Germanic faulty in the last 100 years, but especially since 2000 onwards. The beliefs, virtues and customs of the people, in particular, have been completely overlooked.

That being said, most of what people 'know' about Norse Mythology (especially people who only saw Marvel movies and played God of War 2018) is objectively wrong as well, even if you just read the Poetic Edda.

And so, without further ado.



Gods, Giants and Everything Neither

The Gods are giants.

Yes, really.

But they are not jotnar.

Jotun does not mean giant, it means devourer. Jotnar is the plural of that.

In fact, very few of the jotnar anywhere are portrayed as gigantic. And when they are gigantic - it's either an illusion (Utgard-Loki) or the gods involved are also gigantic, i.e. Thor can fish Jormungandr out of the sea and carry Aegir's cauldron upside down as a hat, a cauldron big enough to sate all the gods, including Thor whose drinking horn is connected to the sea in one poem, leading to him drinking so much the sea level drops. Bottom line, the Aesir (and presumably Vanir) are as gigantic as the gods in other mythologies (i.e. Fionn mac Cumhail, Bran the Blessed and all his kind, all the Tuatha de Danaan, hell even Arthur in the original British folklore was a giant).

There were no Gods of [Insert Domain Here]. Original Germanic and Norse beliefs were a blend of animism (i.e. everything has a soul, like in Shinto or Finnish/Sami), and ancestor worship (the elves were never anything else than ancestor spirits). So Frey, Tyr, Thor (never mind these are all just epithets, like one would use for fae, see a theme?) are just the Revered Ancestors that ended up most prominent in their culture. That's why every god is a god of 'insert a whole list of things here'. People are complex and multidimensional, and a competent man (and leader) was expected to know how to do a lot of useful stuff.

After all, kings had great power and authority but were elected.

Crucial Cultural Components

Boys, uncles and joint rule


Joint rule between brothers, or a father and son, or nephew and uncle, were common. For this reason, Marvel's Thor movie has one thing going for it - it does make sense that Odin would see Thor crowned, but still remain in charge himself, even without the Odinsleep plot device.

More relevant to this topic, the relationship between a boy and his uncle was very important in germanic-norse culture. For this reason, Thor traveling with Loki would not only be considered acceptable, it would be expected.

Especially when a certain half of that pair needed plausible deniability for being away from the capital and, thus, unable to break yet more things (no, it's not Thor I'm talking about here).

Flyting

A flyting was a shit talking contest, plain and simple. The aim was to single someone out during a feast and roast the hell out of them for the amusement of everyone else. Bonus points if the guy is known for talking himself up day to day. The other guy was not expected to defend himself (because the one talking shit was expected to keep it to real stuff, however badly exagerrated). Instead, the target was expected to keep his cool and give as good as he got. Whoever failed first became the laughing stock, which is why disengaging from the contest (ignoring the guy) was better than getting defensive. That said, because the shit flung around was still expected to be real, even if badly exaggerrated, this becomes very important context that isn't generally taken into consideration when interpreting the Lokasenna. Nobody would actually believe Odin is anything but a straight man, for example, if this wasn't glossed over every single time (see below).

The Soul and Its Parts

The most ubiquitous sources (which God of War 2018 used) say the norse believed there were 4 parts. There is, however, evidence to suggest there were in fact eight
  1. Önd-Spirit
  2. Sál-Soul
  3. Minni-Memory (Munin)
  4. Hugr-Mind/Thoughts (Hugin)
  5. Hamr-Skin/Outer form
  6. Hamingja-Luck/Fortune
  7. Fylgja-Follower/Protective spirit
  8. Ódr-Frenzy/Inspiration/Passion/Poetry
So their view was more like that of Egypt, though not named or interpreted quite the same.

Reincarnation

It is and has always been a thing in germanic/norse culture, dating back to the European farmers of the Neolithic, well before even the Indo-European mix-up. Not all the parts above reincarnated though, or at least, not all in the same world.

The old people of Europe (Norse and others) practiced something called burial mounds, where they interred their most famous and infamous family members, which became deified over time and are treated as a moral authority. Most critical to this discussion, however, is that those burial mounds are always intended to be temporary. They don't only serve as a spot for utiseta ('sitting out', where you meditate on top of the mound at night and communicate with the spirits there).

In the eddas, Odin and others use meditation or galdr (incantation magic) to summon ancestor ghosts to cast invulnerability and other spells on them, and give them cool artefacts. However, in the culture itself that Snorri (and Christians in general) did their best to stamp out, you're also supposed to breach the mound at some point after a few generations (full moon and/or midday sex may or may not be involved) so that the Ancestor spirit can be reincarnated in your bloodline. It wasn't strange to wait for years before naming your kid, so you could figure out which ancestor he might be based on his talents and behaviour. A fun event was the May Festival, when people LARPed as the gods and the best man and woman of the area became May King and May Queen, and generally got married and produced a kid just as Summer became Winter later that year.

Incidentally, Newgrange in Ireland was designed so that the sun reached the deepest, far wall of of its main chamber at a very specific time in the year. Not actually a norse thing, but as (one of) the oldest buildings anywhere, I thought it might be relevant.

Long Life and Immortality

This is more of a common sense extrapolation on my part, but when someone lives forever (or damn near it), they eventually master however many skills and trades they put their mind to. In this context, it makes sense that natural inborn powers, or size, would be the deciding factors in confrontations and decision-making in all the myths about giants and gods. When you're every bit as good at the spear as the other guy, but he's three times your size and can chew boulders, it makes sense that you'd beat a tactical retreat and come up with a trick instead. So when Thor goes full giant size against Utgard-Loki but his illusion still dwarfs him, of course he'd run away and try to bash his head in while he was asleep. Granted, 'bash first and introduce yourself later' isn't the best look either, but Jotun means devourer for a reason (see below).

Asgard

Asgard is just one of at least three heavens we know of, the others being Gimle and Vidblainn, which in turn are not all the afterlife (i.e. Hel, Ran's Hall, Sindri's Hall, etc., there are a LOT of possible afterlives in Gemanic-Norse culture). It's unclear if this means there are more than nine realms, or if two or more of the places on that list are there by mistake. Certainly, some people believe the trolls, at least, would have their own Heim somewhere instead of, say, nifleheim.

Individuals vs. Pop Culture Doppelgangers
(not going through all of them, only the ones that are misrepresented most consistently).

Thor

Is a big, brawny redhead. Physique would look more like Farnese Hercules than modern-day bodybuilders (i.e. extremely thick lat muscles, narrow waist is for chumps). Has long hair and full beard.

Deified Heracles figure or equivalent (if not the same person). In the Eddas, he's the ultimate good guy, the god most benign to mankind. He introduced agriculture and went around destroying jotnar to make space for humanity, which is why he was perpetually late to God events. He's the most powerful being alive, even without Mjolnir (in fact, it might seem that losing Megingjord, his belt, would cripple him a lot more).

Thor lives in Thrudheim (Hall of Strength, though 'truda' also means 'hard work' and 'sweat of one's brow' in some European languages). Thrudheim is a hall in Asgard. He is married to Sif, whose hair (which Loki cuts and has replacements made or else) is an allegory for the harvest. Magni and Modi are his sons, though Magni is apparently son of a Jotunn woman Jarnsaxa (incidentally, germanic-norse culture allowed polygamy, or at least concubines). Thrud is his daughter by Sif. Modi's mother is unclear.

Thor is also the one god that nobody fucks with and has no patience for tricksters, much less liars. For this reason, he's the only one who can call out Loki as the liar he is during a flyting without losing face (more on this below).

He's also a fertility god. He officiated marriages, during which he basically lifted Mjolnir and drew a 'cross' in the air over couples (the four cardinal points) to bless a matrimony. Later, a Godi (priest) did that with a Thor's Hammer pendant / replica.

Was close buddies with Earendil (yes, really, he's an actual guy, though the proper name in Britain is Earendel, and in Norse it's Aurvandil) and made a star from his toe.

Apparently, Thor has a rock embedded in his forehead from when he smashed Hrungnir's head.

He travels around with Loki, who is his uncle. Most of his adventures away from Asgard read like classical hero fairy tales, rather than god myths, which makes sense if you go with the Icelandic scholars' translations where his belt is only there to keep him man-sized.

Perhaps the most important thing here is that the Cult of Thor predates the appearance of that of Odin by thousands of years. An (the?) oldest version of the name Thor found written anywhere is 'thun(o)raz' or 'thun(a)raz' which means thunder. But the word Thor is the result of language drift originating from tiwaz which means God. Tiwaz itself is a cognate (alternate version basically) of Dyeus or Diawas, which is the first half of Dyeus Phter, which means Father Sky. These names and their associated holy symbols have been found to date all the way back to the stone age, predating even Mycaenean Greece, which itself predates classical Greece by about 600-1000 years, depending on how far back to its beginning you look.

Essentially, Thor and Tyr are the same person, and that person is the actual Father of everything, if indeed there even is one (more on that below). Thor may also, in fact, be the equivalent of the Greek Ouranos if you go back long enough. In fact (though this is my extrapolation, so take it how you will), one of his oldest names is Tonaros, and if you consider that the languages were more guttural, and people tended to lose a lot of letters and sounds from words, especially in writing, it's not hard to see how Tonaros would have become Toranos and eventually Ouranos further south (Ouranos is pronounced 'oh-raw-naws' not 'your anus', very important!).

A LOT was changed and lost over time. Using the Greeks as comparison again, there is no actual evidence that Heracles was bisexual, that's a purely post-Classical Greece revision, and a very tenuous one at that if you really look into it, most of the claims about Greek sexuality have been debunked, no matter how much Hollywood and the legacy media pretends otherwise. Same with Rome.

Odin

Odin is a title, meaning the 'frenzied one.' His (most likely) real name is Vidrir. He is part of the initial Ymir-killing trifecta with Lothur and Hoenir. Ve (Hoenir) means either 'wish' or 'will' and Vili (Lothur) means holy and/or priest.

Eddas portray Odin as the King of all the Gods, the Allfather (interpretations vary), an old man who goes round collecting knowledge (and tricking Jotun intellectual rivals into deadly games of trivia whenever he can) and has something of a hate-relationship with Freyja (who is NOT his wife Frigg). Thor is his son by Jord (Gaea) but apparently not his heir, that's actually Baldr who he has with Frigg. He steals back the Mead of Poetry (the 'back' is very important).

Odin inherited a lot of the attributes of Thor/Tyr as his cult rose to prominence. The Havamal is, I think, just the most obvious part.

He is neither a coward nor afraid of death. Nowehere in any writing is Odin afraid to put his life on the line, he does it many times, whether in trivia games or in his bet with Freya that a follower of his isn't a bad host (in which she cheats). Also, when Ragnarok comes, he's the first at the head of the Host to charge in battle against the 'wolf'.

However, germanic-norse culture DOES have a concept roughly translated as joyful defiance. Which, in a culture where volvas predicted your fate at the drop of a hat, meant to live the fullest life you could and try to kick a bad fate in the teeth because you're a bloody adult that don't need no hand held or someone to tell you how to live your life. Additionally, before Snorri, it was fairly well understood that Ragnarok was a cyclical event (most of the myths were, they were tied to the cycle of the night sky, astronomy, each god had their own constellations). In this context, Odin's eternal quest to 'avert' Ragnarok is his quest to stop the cycle of extinction.

Conclusion: Odin literally spends his entire life trying to defeat the fermi paradox. The fact he is denigrated for this in pop culture today is something I find rather dishonest. Pretending all the myth and magic was literal for a moment, since he's gone but we're doing better than ever, maybe he even succeeded.

Odin's cult appears to have emerged only after the Bronze Age, which may explain pretty much every inconsistency in his character in the Eddas - it's hard to think that the person who recited the Havamal is the same as the tricksome wanderer of the other poems, never mind the extremely dangerous and seemingly capricious person in the Sagas or Gestas that even beats his favorite conquering king to death at one point, by bashing him over the head with his staff.

Basically, as with all religious syncretism, Odin took over most of the King attributes of Tyr/Thor. Possibly because the King, as a symbol of the realm's wholeness, couldn't afford to be physically imperfect any more than any other flaw, as was the case with Tyr after he lost his hand. Compare with Nuada in Irish mythology.

That said, a very important thing that nobody knows, unfortunately, is that Allfather is language drift from Alfǫðr, which certain scholars believe has been mistranslated - apparently, it could actually mean 'all orderer'. Considering that Odin rose to prominence during the Bronze Age Collapse, it's not hard to see why - anyone capable of carving a demesne and culture in that mess would be deified. That's how Jamshid and Krishna made it too.

Finally, in the context of burial mounds mentioned above, Odin naming a son Thor could just be an attempt to return the mighty ancestor god to the world (or otherwise gain legitimacy) by having the dead god reincarnate into your bloodline (see the May Festival and Newgrange again).

Loki

'Loki' means either fire or knot, but nobody knows for sure. His father, 'farbauti', means 'dangerous striker' or 'sudden striker'. Laufey is his mother and her name may mean leaf or leafy. For theses reasons, he is generally considered an allegory for the forest fires that start after lightning strikes (i.e. why he always 'accompanies' Thor).

Loki's real name is Fenrir.

Yes, really. The wolf's name is Fenrisulfr, which means Fenrir's wolf.

(Fenrir is possibly just another title itself, since it might nean 'dweller of the fenns' or swamps. Incidentally, the Fennlanders - the 'fenn dwellers' indigenous Finnish / Sami are often magicians or teachers of magic to norse/germanic heroes in sagas and gestas).

In the Eddas, he is the blood-brother of Odin and thus Thor's uncle. Thor, in turn, may or may not have been his keeper, meant to keep him on a short leash and away from Asgard. Considering what happens with Baldr and the Lokasenna, this can be widely considered as a wise move.

Any claims that he went around fucking animals are tenuous at best. In germanic/norse culture, shapeshifting has never meant anything else but tossing your mind into an animal, that's one of the few things GRRM transposed correctly into his own world. In this vein, Loki borrowed 'skins' in this way, like when he borrows Freyja's 'feather cloak' (note - kennings are idioms used in place of the real word for the purposes of poetry) to see where Mjolnir got to. Or when he and Heimdall both 'take the forms' of seals to fight over Freyja's necklace in the arctic. I have trouble seeing Loki remain in the mare that lures Svadilfari away, especially since Sleipnir is just a metaphor for the winds Odin/Thor rides with their chariot.

Loki is initially an agent of chaos, but eventually becomes an objectively malicious force. He is not some misunderstood abuse victim, he caused a lot of trouble because it was funny, barely weasled his way out of it almost every time, usually it was because Odin kept endorsing his rules-lawyering (because he actually did his part of the blood-brother vow) and Loki turned around and got Baldr murdered despite that for the incredible reason of 'because why not?' This eventually went to his head and he actually bragged about murdering Baldr (and Hodr by extension, since the poor guy got the blame beforehand) and got tied up so at least the world could enjoy whatever time was left before the next extinction event. His punishment was cruel and unusual, and a good debate could be had over whether he actually deserves Sigyn's devotion.

Likening Loki to Prometheus is a reach, to put it mildly (and this is before we try to figure out if Snorri was adding his own stuff there to enforce the parallel). It's not impossible that Snorri demonised him more than he actually was, to have the devil in there, but I have trouble thinking of any occasion where Loki did mankind any direct favors like Prometheus did.

That said, if people wonder why he seemed to get the better of everyone in the Lokasenna, that's because it is a flyting (see above) and he was lying more than half the time, which Odin, as his blood brother and host, was obligated to gloss over as long as it stayed at words. Everyone stopped flyting back, including Odin, because dismissal was better than getting defensive. When they each let Loki have the last word in the poem, they weren't conceding defeat, it was collective shunning. One might even make a case for public shaming.

Then Thor arrives and he, as Loki's eternal keeper and the most pathologically blunt person in all mythology everywhere, is the one who can call him out on lying and be believed, so Loki finally backs down after Thor threatens him with Mjolnir for the third time. He'd already admitted to killing Baldr though, so he finally got his comeuppance.

Where were the Jotnar in the War?

Jotun means devourer, as said before. They are neither Aesir nor Vanir, and in fact it's difficult to say where the Jotnar stand relative to them. Whatever it is, it's not a particularly flattering look. In fact, their behaviour and attempts to 'get one over' the Gods is what I would expect from war profiteers. Swindling them out of war reparations, stealing artefacts to demand their best women in payment, stealing the women outright, even stealing and plundering inborn powers (metaphors or not).

The jotnar didn't participate in the Aesir-Vanir war (which the Vanir technically won) but they earned the moniker 'devourer' somehow, which sounds (to me at least) like a third nation raiding both sides and otherwise being exploitative to everybody. It's unlikely that they were benign or honorable. People talk a lot about how the Aesir weasled out of the deal with the wall builder, but these are the same people who tried to take advantage of a war-torn nation and did a number of other nasty shit before and after that, like steal the Mead of Poetry despite not being able to use it (I might make this its own post later). Three dwarves (or possible elves) killed Kvasir, but the giants stole the mead later just so nobody else could have it.

Despite this, a fair bunch of the individually named jotnar are portrayed either positively, or at least worthy of respect. Even if it's only the respect of a credible or proven threat. This might indicate that they weren't a proper faction, so much as a bunch of people from the same race who lived really far apart from each other and accepted no authority but their own. Jotunheim might not even have existed before Snorri put it in the list of nine worlds, since the aforementioned jotnar mostly seemed to have their homes on Midgard. That was why Thor was constantly roaming the earth to battle them.

Magic and How to Completely Miss the Point

Seidr doesn't mean magic. It's a specific approach to practicing magic, almost always a specific kind of magic called orlog (fate). And this approach can be summarised as 'they couldn't make suppositories so they used sticks instead.' See, the ancient people knew more about herbs and mushrooms than we do, and among those things were consciousness-altering mixtures. But because the best ones were poisonous if ingested, they figured out other ways to get them into their brains.

The witch's broomstick is a motif originating with the 'staff riding' of volvas, and that staff wasn't ridden horizontally, but vertically from a raised platform so they could get several good hours in the trance, thus allowing them to do divination for the whole village at once and go home.

Thus, for a man to practice seidr, the only mucosa comparable in absorption properties to the volva's vagina was the one in the anus.

This is why Loki called Odin unmanly, because for all everyone hearing the oral poem knew, the only way he could have practiced seidr was to fuck himself on Gungnir's blunt end.

Since Loki is a big fat liar, I think it's more likely Odin either figured out the same brews can also be absorbed through the armpit (if at lower efficacy) or he did outright stab himself through some place with his spear to inject the stuff directly into his bloodstream, and spent nine days in a trance so he only had to do it once.

The many forms of norse and germanic magic include galdr (incantation), spa (divination), rune magic, necromancy (shamanism), brew making (herbalism, potions), utiseta (sitting meditation), arsgang (walking meditaton), shapeshifting (skinchanging), staves (magic symbols, extremely wide utility from just etching lines into and from various things) and many derivatives thereof. All of which were completely free of any stigma and were practiced by both men and women, if they got someone to teach them.

Or if they happened to be near a henbane bush when it caught fire.

ADDENDUM: Some scholars consider seidr to be the same as the broader shamanism, which seems tied to its role in the norse equivalent of 'opening the third eye.' Basically, learning any type of magic becomes much easier once you've already welcome the supernatural into yourself. Since the seidr state enables possession by ancestors or other spirits, likening it to shamanism isn't a groundless claim. You can do more than orlog with it, if you know what you're doing.

Various Trivia

  • Yggdrassil might actually mean Tree of Knowledge.
  • Yggdrassil might be a metaphor (kenning) for humanity.
  • Sleipnir may be a metaphor for the four winds (or eight, depending on what count you use)
  • Hlidskjalf, Odin's throne, seems to be the Sun. Why Freyr gets to sit on it in that one poem is up for debate.
  • Heimdallr may be a name for the Firmament, and is assumed by some to be a title of Tyr, at least before he turned into Thor (see above). If this is true, he is the universe that perceives itself, and the scale at which Norse cosmology worked is much vaster than we assume, rivaling the Vedic and Hindu one.
  • Heimdallr was the 'whitest of the gods', sorry Idris Elba, you're a great actor but Marvel's original portrayal of a light-skinned redhead was more on point. Admittedly, some people say 'whitest' is supposed to mean 'most virtuous' but every claim to that effect seems based on personal preference (or ideology). Also, that epithet must have come from somewhere, so if anything it probably means both.
  • Heimdall is described as 'son of nine mothers.' Scholars explain this as the offspring of the nines wave spirits, the daughters of Aegir. But I'm personally more inclined towards 'reincarnation'
  • There was a certain concept called 'wulthuz' in germanic-norse culture, which means 'glory.' The term referred to a manifest attribute of kingliness, like the 'farr' of the middle-east. In writing, this is usually described along the lines of 'the sun shines out of his face.' NOT as a metaphor.

This is it for now. If this thread garners any interest, I may add further, more in-depth stuff on these or other topics.
 
Last edited:
Is there anything at all on Angrboda and whatever the hell Nidhoggr is?
Angrboda is taken to mean 'the one who brings grief', 'she-who-offers-sorrow', or 'harm-bidder'.

She is a 'mate' of Loki (not his wife, that's Sigyn), a jotunn woman from the Ironwood forest. She, apparently, birthed Fenrisulfr, Jormungandr and Hel. But apparently she also birthed every other wolf ever. Snorri's Gylfaginning says Angrboda 'breeds as sons many giants in wolf shapes' and that from that clan will come one wolf who will swallow the Sun and Moon and splatter them with blood and generally cause the end of the world. Snorri in the prose Edda calls this wolf Moongarm (origin unclear). So, Fenrisulfr might not necessarily even be the apocalypse wolf, though supposedly the Gods hear about him and the other two, freak out over the prophecies and do the self-fulfilling doom thing.

Wolves were not looked upon with kind eyes by the norse, in case it wasn't obvious.

Nidhoggr is the penultimate monster of Norse myth, the 'worm' or 'serpent' eternally chewing on Yggdrasil's roots. He hates the eagle Verdfolnir, who roosts in Yggdrasil's branches, and vice versa. Entirely because Ratatoskr, the rat-toothed squirrel (rat-toothed is what its name is taken to mean), keeps going up and down the tree and telling both of them that the other guy is talking shit about him. Whether the shit talking is genuine or Ratatoskr is making it all up for the lulz seem at least partially contested.

Philosophically, Nidhoggr is considered an allegory for the ageing of humans and eventual death, in the context where Yggdrassil is considered a kenning for the human body. Also, he may not necessarily be the only worm/serpent gnawing on the roots (and náir, which means dead men). Or, perhaps just one specific root, depending on how the cosmology is interpreted spatially.

There's also at least one attestation describing Nidhogg as flying DOWN from the Nida'fells (Nidavellir, or a place there).

In any case, Nidhoggr is the opposite of a benign entity and often depicted as a ravenous dragon for this reason. He's supposed to be colossally huge, incidentally.
 
Last edited:
What of Surtr? I've read that he is the 'swarthy one' that resides in Muspelheim and is a general/war leader who breaks the Rainbow bridge, kills Frey and burns down Yggdrasill in Ragnarök.
That's about all anyone knows about him. A Jotunn through and through (God of War Ragnarok pretty much flipped the narrative and moral roles of everyone in the myths).

If we go with the myths being allegory, Surtr is probably the natural disaster envisioned as the cause behind the next mass extinction. The Germanics/Norse envisioned Ragnarok as a fiery end rather than a water flood, so Surtr might be a stand-in for either a volcano or a meteor / comet impact. This may or may not suggest that their ancestors were close enough to witness whatever event caused the floods in every other mythology everywhere else (i.e. the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, if not an older similar event).

If we take the myths literally, Surtr as a character isn't quite as great a warrior as all that because he only wins because Freyr gave up his sword in an earlier story (which may or may not involve him becoming a pacifist).

Speculations can go on endlessly, but this is about everything explicitly said or implied.
 
Last edited:
Is there anything related to overall IndoEuropean Mythology?

I think Indra and Hercules were once related to Thor somehow

Also, any chance the Vanir represent the gods of the Old Europeans before the IndoEuropean Migrations/Invasions?
 
Is there anything related to overall IndoEuropean Mythology?

I think Indra and Hercules were once related to Thor somehow

Also, any chance the Vanir represent the gods of the Old Europeans before the IndoEuropean Migrations/Invasions?
The reconstruction of old prehistory is an ongoing thing, and I'm not as thoroughly versed in it so I might be getting some things wrong, but I'll try to formulate a coherent theory.

This actually doesn't seem to be the case. The original gods of the Old Europeans seem to have been a pair of brothers, one of whom was ritually sacrificed to give life to the world and/or humanity (our outright create the world from his corpse). He then ends up as the ruler of the Underworld. The surviving brother is/becomes Father Sky (as in the Firmament, whose throne or eye is the Sun).

After that, it seems God (Diawas / Tyr, who is actually Thor) or a hero acting in his name (Heracles / Thor again) went around teaching agriculture, slaying monsters (not dragons, initially, dragons were depicted as benevolent rain deities back then) and generally establishing civilization. This 'cult' of Thor was later supplanted by Odin's, but that wasn't the Aesir-Vanir war either. If any war at all.

The Aesir - Vanir war has the Vanir as cultural subversives, and the Aesir as going to war in order to keep their culture. It seems to be an allegory for the Sun cult vs. Moon cult 'war' that happened around the time of Orpheus, Zalmoxis, etc (the Moon cults offered sexualt liberation as a way to give the finger to the dogmatic and morally prescriptive tyrrany the ancestral Sun cults may or may not have become at that point). The unkillable mythic prostitute Gullweig (which Odin kills three times to no avail, and is used as an inciting incident) is an allegory for the matriarchal witchcraft and nighly orgy and blood/child sacrifice religion, in that context.

This may have been conflated (or manifested as) a certain conflict between two peoples in Asia called the Aseras (the name isn't coincidental) and Vanaras (of the Ramayana fame).

There's some anount of copium going around. The Asera/Vanara and Sun/Moon 'war' (it more likely was a multi-generational conflict between the aforementioned religions, or steppe nomads vs. sedentary agriculturists, probably both) resulted in the contrast between Avestan and Hindu expressions of the Indo-European religions - the former side venerates the Asuras as the good guys (Asera / Aesir), while the others hold to the Devas (Vanara / Vanir).

In late Norse myth, the Vanir technically win the war of arms, but the strategic victory belongs to the Aesir because their culture is the one who wins put, which was the whole point. This is almost certainly related to the anthropologic journey of Odin's cult - a bunch of Aserans (led by Odin, or whatever his real name was) picked up and left the Indus Valley (or wherever) after (or during) the mess, and went over into the lands of the Old Europeans. Over time, their stories blended, and the rest is history.

Indra SEEMS to be the original Asura Father Sky (Asera / Aesir, the Brother who lived) and his conflicting portrayals are a later result of the guys on the Hindu side doing the revisionist history thing for all the Asuras (as opposed to the Devas). Despite this, the Sun cult cultural mores seem to have won in their case too, ironically.
 
Last edited:
The reconstruction of old prehistory is an ongoing thing, and I'm not as thoroughly versed in it so I might be getting some things wrong, but I'll try to formulate a coherent theory.

This actually doesn't seem to be the case. The original gods of the Old Europeans seem to have been a pair of brothers, one of whom was ritually sacrificed to give life to the world and/or humanity. He then ends up as the ruler of the Underworld.

After that, it seems God (Diawas / Tyr, who is actually Thor) or a hero acting in his name (Heracles / Thor again) went around teaching agriculture, slaying monsters (not dragons, initially, dragons were depicted as benevolent rain deities back then) and generally establishing civilization. This 'cult' of Thor was later supplanted by Odin's, but that wasn't the Aesir-Vanir war either. If any war at all.

The Aesir - Vanir war has the Vanir as cultural subversives, and the Aesir as going to war in order to keep their culture. It seems to be an allegory for the Sun cult vs. Moon cult 'war' that happened around the time of Orpheus, Zalmoxis, etc (the Moon cults offered sexualt liberation as a way to give the finger to the dogmatic and morally prescriptive tyrrany the ancestral Sun cults may or may not have become at that point). The unkillable mythic prostitute Gullweig (which Odin kills three times to no avail, and is used as an inciting incident) is an allegory for the matriarchal witchcraft and nighly orgy and blood/child sacrifice religion, in that context.

This may have been conflated (or manifested as) a certain conflict between two peoples in Asia called the Aseras (the name isn't coincidental) and Vanaras (of the Ramayana fame).

There's some anount of copium going around. The Asera/Vanara and Sun/Moon 'war' (it more likely was a multi-generational conflict between the aforementioned religions, or steppe nomads vs. sedentary agriculturists, probably both) resulted in the contrast between Avestan and Hindu expressions of the Indo-European religions - the former side venerates the Asuras as the good guys, while the others hold to the Devas.

In late Norse myth, the Vanir technically win the war of arms, but the strategic victory belongs to the Aesir because their culture is the one who wins put, which was the whole point. This is almost certainly related to the anthropologic journey of Odin's cult - a bunch of Aserans (led by Odin, or whatever his real name was) picked up and left the Indus Valley (or wherever) after (or during) the mess, and went over into the lands of the Old Europeans. Over time, their stories blended, and the rest is history.

Indra SEEMS to be the original Asura Father Sky (Asera / Aesir, the Brother who lived) and his conflicting portrayals are a later result of the guys on the Hindu side doing the revisionist history thing for all the Asuras (as opposed to the Devas). Despite this, the Sun cult cultural mores seem to have won in their case too, ironically.

Aedra VS Daedra?
 
I'm not going to give Kirkbride quite this much credit. God wars are a standard part of myths and fantasy, he could've gotten the idea from anywhere. Also, a lot of this stuff either hadn't been discovered when the ES lore was codified, or was restricted to a few old, generally unknown books that hadn't been repopularized yet.
 
Last edited:
It seems that 3 pops up a lot in the myths/legends/religions. 9 realms (3 each of heaven, earth and underworld), 3 Norns, 3 groups (Asir/Vanir/jotun), 3 'doomsday' children of Loki (Hel/Jormander/Fenris), 3 ways Odin gains wisdom (hang from tree/eye for water/drink magic mead)
This isn't how it was like originally though. Initially, there was the number two: heaven/earth, world/underworld, brother/twin (the two gods), sacrifice/sacrificer, day/night, warm/cold, summer/winter (they didn't have spring/fall as separate things, probably because mediterranean/tundra climate), work/rest, life/death, etc. Number 3 became popular later. It might have happened when the first hero(es) became popular enough to shape culture as much as the twin gods, not least because of how many children they fathered (a return of ancestor veneration). Alternatively, it might have been a foreign god/culture invading/being assimilated via religious syncretism (the indo-european horse god of the steppe nomads for example, possibly where Slepnir comes from, and every sentient magic horse in fairy tales).
 
Last edited:
Is it a good time to bring up my theories regarding Vanir and Jotun being blond Native-Europeans/Pre-Aryans, with the former completely subsumed while the latter became Sami, and a general term for foreign "gods" from different cardinal directions.

Also the 9 realms referring to a plane of nine squares for Midgard and the surrounding realms. While the heavens and greater underworld exist in a cube, all-together the cosmology can be better represented by 3^3, or 27 cube-realms.
 
Is it a good time to bring up my theories regarding Vanir and Jotun being blond Native-Europeans/Pre-Aryans, with the former completely subsumed while the latter became Sami, and a general term for foreign "gods" from different cardinal directions.

Also the 9 realms referring to a plane of nine squares for Midgard and the surrounding realms. While the heavens and greater underworld exist in a cube, all-together the cosmology can be better represented by 3^3, or 27 cube-realms.

Aren't there still "Old Europeans" around?
 
Aren't there still "Old Europeans" around?
Technically yes but it depends how "old" you count.

At best you can divide between Post-aryans and pre-aryan-Europeans. Who themselves likely wiped out the builders of most monolithic structures. Although there's some interesting genetics to dig into like Atlas Berbers and Sami having a shared pre-Aryan-invasion ancestor.
 
Technically yes but it depends how "old" you count.

At best you can divide between Post-aryans and pre-aryan-Europeans. Who themselves likely wiped out the builders of most monolithic structures. Although there's some interesting genetics to dig into like Atlas Berbers and Sami having a shared pre-Aryan-invasion ancestor.

The Finns are an ethnic group, whom I think for the most part are "old European" because their language doesn't have traces of ProtoIndoEuropean
 
Is it a good time to bring up my theories regarding Vanir and Jotun being blond Native-Europeans/Pre-Aryans, with the former completely subsumed while the latter became Sami, and a general term for foreign "gods" from different cardinal directions.

Also the 9 realms referring to a plane of nine squares for Midgard and the surrounding realms. While the heavens and greater underworld exist in a cube, all-together the cosmology can be better represented by 3^3, or 27 cube-realms.
Genetically, blue eyes are considered a mutation, as is red hair. And blond hair, for that matter (I think). Red hair and green eyes definitely. It's more likely the native Aryans were the Aesir, not Vanir. Or that they were the same ethnicity all along.

Fun anecdote: the Muslims in Iberia before the Reconquista referred to the Vikings as Madjus (Magi, Zoroastrian priests). Some of the Vikings converted to Islam in order to get carte blanche to marry into the nobles of the territory, and war and raid to their heart's content. They could stomach this because a lot of the muslims there were Berber (blue-eyed white people, many of them blondes and even redheads).
 
Genetically, blue eyes are considered a mutation, as is red hair. And blond hair, for that matter (I think). Red hair and green eyes definitely. It's more likely the native Aryans were the Aesir, not Vanir. Or that they were the same ethnicity all along.

Fun anecdote: the Muslims in Iberia before the Reconquista referred to the Vikings as Madjus (Magi, Zoroastrian priests). Some of the Vikings converted to Islam in order to get carte blanche to marry into the nobles of the territory, and war and raid to their heart's content. They could stomach this because a lot of the muslims there were Berber (blue-eyed white people, many of them blondes and even redheads).

I know a very politically incorrect book that mentions possible IndoEuropean or IndoAryan Migrations/Invasions to multiple corners of the world

The guy ignored that the giant skeletons found in North American caves, were well, cannibalistic giants, sure they were redheads but far as I can tell, no IndoEuropean groups were giant man eaters

Some Native American tribes trace partial descent from these red headed giants whom they killed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top