CosmicBigfoot
Not too sore, are you?
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2022
- Messages
- 250
- Likes received
- 10,756
Yeah, that's fine with me
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, that's fine with me
like add it to the little text box thing under peoples posts on desktop. like have the quote on their posts
What they said. "Sig" is short for "signature", used as a verb.
Just download the image and upload it to some place like postimages or imagechest....huh. Don't think I've ever had to link to sites like that for an image, but to be safe/clarify: mentioning the links/location (so long at the content itself isn't pirated) like the example above is still okay to do?
edit: i.e. [site name] dot [com/net/etc]
The reason people asked several times about Dropbox and Mega is that this paragraph implies those domains would be blocked. Could use rewording.As such, we have implemented Xenforo's word replacement/censorship to auto break the URL links to those sites. This will work by breaking the clickability of the websites.
I am generally very strongly anti-censorship and pro-being able to discuss whatever lewd stuff I like and link to it.I think the average user of QQ should be internet savvy enough to find most content even with zero links, so the fact that people can still give name drops and say what site they pulled it from doesn't really make this update that big of a deal. If you ask someone for the sauce and they just say "332281 nhentai" that alone should be enough for 9/10 users. If someone still needs to be dripfed even after that then just do a full name drop and say "Natsu no Senpai no Oshiri on Nhentai". If they STILL need to be dripfed then... oh well! Not all sea turtles make it to the ocean. Not all gooners make it to the strip club.
The reason people asked several times about Dropbox and Mega is that this paragraph implies those domains would be blocked. Could use rewording.
Do not link to pirated content.
- Linking to manga reader sites and image hosting sites like Danbooru, imgur, etc does not count.
- Manga readers that give a download option, such as ExHentai, may be mentioned along with the title of a work, but not linked to.
- Linking download repositories like Dropbox, MegaSync, etc DOES count as linking to pirated content if the content in the shared link is pirated.
I am curious, did something happen to spook you so much all of a sudden?
I am asking because the legal distinction has been made before where torrents are concerned.
Also, as fan works, which is a major portion of the content on those sites doujinshi can't really be copyrighted.
Original work could be, but there are also other mueky dependencies, like of the work has been licensed outside of Japan.
IIRC one artist struck a deal with some US based publishers and they struck original content they had licensed.
Sites like nhentai actually don't have them when they had them previously.
You really keep pushing huh? I'm not sure why you do when it's been explained a few times.Just download the image and upload it to some place like postimages or imagechest.
TBH with more and more sites using crap like cloudflare and making it harder to see even static content those should be better than direct links to manga sites, even if the manga sites are on the approved list.
It would be annoying but then again I have maybe linked to covers of stuff on here once at most twice.
And I think I had to use an image site aneuad because nhentai didn't like the direct linking.
Even if the work is an original and even if it is licensed in the west "citing" it should not be illegal since you are just showing the cover or one or two pages.
I am curious, did something happen to spook you so much all of a sudden?
so not really, no.It was more like, I did a search for a couple of the sites on a whim, and it came back with 40 pages or results. So instead of processing all of that, we turned to a technology solution that ult implemented.
I am asking because I am curious if somebody started harassing the site with copyright claims or if some legal nonsense in the USA happened.You really keep pushing huh? I'm not sure why you do when it's been explained a few times.
A single ruling does not a precedent set, so the safe option for avoiding having to spend money that they shouldn't need to spend is to avoid the liability entirely. You can discuss it, you can even talk explicitly about the content and the location but you cannot use QQ as the middle man through actual links. Simple as.
And they have pointed out that legal specifics do not protect from legal action itself, nothing stops frivolous lawsuits and preventing it from becoming an issue is vastly easier than fixing it while already paying money for lawyers to debate things already decided but aren't EXACTLY like this case as the legal system is the triangle love child of a pedantic, a sloth and greed.I am asking because I am curious if somebody started harassing the site with copyright claims or if some legal nonsense in the USA happened.
That and I am pointing out thet there are lots of legal specifics ralatsd to the subject.
Fair enough, though some idiot or A.I. slopbot might be harassing the place.
And the admin staff here has specified thet they are not lawyers and don't want to deal with it.And they have pointed out that legal specifics do not protect from legal action itself, nothing stops frivolous lawsuits and preventing it from becoming an issue is vastly easier than fixing it while already paying money for lawyers to debate things already decided but aren't EXACTLY like this case as the legal system is the triangle love child of a pedantic, a sloth and greed.
This isn't a new rule. The rule was already in place. The only thing that's changed is that now QQ automatically breaks certain links that violate the rule by replacing some of the text. The reason being that we noticed a crap-ton of rule violations, and we didn't want to go through all of them and hand out warnings to everybody when we could just break the links and post a reminder.That's basically my take on this as well. From the sound of things the new rule just boils down to "you can do just about everything except directly post and link to pirated content". This isn't really a change that demands elite ball knowledge to adapt to.
Discussing piracy is not the same as hosting links to piracy.So no DIRECT links.
But if I just mention what site I used to get something that's fine? I think? Just from reading the new rule and how it's written, I could tell someone where I pirate my movies from but giving them a link would be a nono.
But my interpretation probably violates the spirit of the rule and puts y'all in a sticky situation.
I suspect sheer laziness.I don't see why people are still trying to circumvent the rule when its directly stated that direct links to illegally hosted copyright content is not allowed. Either people got used to consuming content on pirate sites and think its normal or they just want to keep their own habits and not change it.
Thank fucking ROB. Was wondering if there was a list given I can never tell where actually counts. My HF Image Dumps usually are for the actual Artists' Accounts rather then Commissioner Uploads specifically in hopes someone with actual money gets Interested enough to throw theirs at them. I Know only from osmosis that Mangadex gets you bitchslapped from seeing someone getting Infracted once... By Mega specifically I think? I can't remember, just one of the higher up Mods told off someone for a Rule 3 Violation for Linking Mangadex and someone else mentioning it counts as a piracy Site. If it wasn't specifically mentioned in the Rule I would have never guessed EH counted though especially given some of the things on there are Uploaded by the Authors.Content Disclaimer said:As per Rule 8 Point 3: If this in your Opinion in any capacity, shape, and/or form Violates Rule 5, 8, or 9 then inform me so I may Delete the Post. I guarantee you if any Slurs are present it's because of my ignorance of them and I have had trouble determining what's "On Topic". Check Signature for further elaboration. Assistance is appreciated.
So no DIRECT links.
But if I just mention what site I used to get something that's fine? I think? Just from reading the new rule and how it's written, I could tell someone where I pirate my movies from but giving them a link would be a nono.
But my interpretation probably violates the spirit of the rule and puts y'all in a sticky situation.