1. Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. If you wish to change your username, please ask via conversation to tehelgee instead of asking via my profile. I'd like to not clutter it up with such requests.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. We have added another rule, please check the Rules post for more information.
    Dismiss Notice
  7. Due to some issues with Freenode, the QQ IRC Channel is moving. See here for more information.
    Dismiss Notice

Fluorene Is A Horribly Named Molecule

Discussion in 'General' started by I Just Write, Oct 23, 2020.

  1. I Just Write

    I Just Write Plural System of Eight

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2020
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    232
    And now a brief Chemistry Rant.

    Fluorene is the worst-named hydrocarbon ever. It is pronounced and spelled almost identically to Fluorine, the infamously reactive halogen. And yet, Fluorene contains not even a single atom of Fluorine, which could perhaps have justified the similar names. Instead it's literally just two Benzene rings glued together at a couple of places, with an extra CH2 to bridge the larger gap between rings. I can think of no possible reason for Fluorene to have the name it does other than confusing chemistry students, and I demand that this senseless ambiguity be resolved immediately by renaming Fluorene to something sensible like (2-linked)Biphenylmethane.

    Even if that was a very half-assed name by IUPAC standards, it at the very least avoids the issue of being confused for an element, unlike what happens when (2-linked)Biphenylmethane is referred to by its current name of Fluorene. There is no sensible reason to persist in this horrendous excuse for a chemical misnaming, and it must be resolved immediately before more young chemists are lead astray.

    This message brought to you by the Campaign To Rename Fluorene. Join today for linguistic clarity in chemistry!