• A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
  • Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.

General chat thread

Reader mode
Is it wrong that I am using the toilet twice a day?

Been able to take a dump more than once, early morning, since I started doing workouts more frequently, hell i mostly just take 1-2 meals, lunch and usually a relatively light dinner of yolkless omelette and whatever fish/meat I got

My own concern is that I am walking up 3-4am more often, this means there's something wrong? My shoulders look like they're getting closer to my neck
 
SuperPulp2789 said:
Is it wrong that I am using the toilet twice a day?

Been able to take a dump more than once, early morning, since I started doing workouts more frequently, hell i mostly just take 1-2 meals, lunch and usually a relatively light dinner of yolkless omelette and whatever fish/meat I got

My own concern is that I am walking up 3-4am more often, this means there's something wrong? My shoulders look like they're getting closer to my neck
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Is it a recent development ? With a very active liver it wouldn't be very abnormal.
 
Snooze said:
If you didn't change your alimentation and therés no new stress source, that's a bit weird, yeah.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I think I can adapt a bit, I'll try to make use of my very early mornings for something

I managed to get to really practicing art again, so may as well try that, when I really get rolling I keep on going
 
Anyone know stuff about guns?

Was this made just because it's bitchin' or what?

en.wikipedia.org

Arsenal Firearms AF2011A1 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Pistola-doble-ca%C3%B1on-450x339.jpg
 
MadGreenSon said:
Anyone know stuff about guns?

Was this made just because it's bitchin' or what?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Depending on how you look at it, it was either made because it was bitchin', or it was made to circumvent several major gun laws.

Most notably, the laws against high power and/or armor piercing ammunition.

Now, I'm sure you're wondering, how does this do that? Well, the thing about most second chance armor is that it is second chance armor.

It will (probably) eat one hit of standard (civilian-legal) ammunition up to 9mm*, at the cost of the integrity of everywhere within a foot or so of impact. Any other bullets that hit that area will (probably) penetrate.

*As opposed to 50cal rounds, which don't even need to pierce the armor to kill you.

Very few people have the accuracy to hit the same point twice. This gun? Does it for you. And since the two bullets run tandem, they'll hit within microseconds of one another, thus effectively doubling the already impressive power of the .45 used by this gun.

An illegal amount of stopping power delivered in a totally legal (if only because nobody thought to criminalize it) manner.


In all other ways? It's a pretty lackluster gun. And only viable because it's effectively two Colt 1911s welded together.

More kick and thus less control (though the 1911 is a masterpiece, so it can afford it), and both ejecting and reloading the clip is a mess that'll cost you precious seconds compared to standard clips.

Also, the standard firearm maintenance routine is more of a pain, and I wouldn't expect it to keep the 1911's reliability over the long term.
 
Last edited:
TanaNari said:
Depending on how you look at it, it was either made because it was bitchin', or it was made to circumvent several major gun laws.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Now that is an informative reply! Also, a pretty evil way it could be used.

I looked into this a little further and the person who innovated this particular design, Vivian Mueller, apparently makes fancy custom guns for a living. So the original concept was probably come up with because it's bitchin rather than an evil plan to overcome body armor.
 
MadGreenSon said:
Anyone know stuff about guns?

Was this made just because it's bitchin' or what?

en.wikipedia.org

Arsenal Firearms AF2011A1 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Pistola-doble-ca%C3%B1on-450x339.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
TanaNari said:
Depending on how you look at it, it was either made because it was bitchin', or it was made to circumvent several major gun laws.

Most notably, the laws against high power and/or armor piercing ammunition.

Now, I'm sure you're wondering, how does this do that? Well, the thing about most second chance armor is that it is second chance armor.

It will (probably) eat one hit of standard (civilian-legal) ammunition up to 9mm*, at the cost of the integrity of everywhere within a foot or so of impact. Any other bullets that hit that area will (probably) penetrate.

*As opposed to 50cal rounds, which don't even need to pierce the armor to kill you.

Very few people have the accuracy to hit the same point twice. This gun? Does it for you. And since the two bullets run tandem, they'll hit within microseconds of one another, thus effectively doubling the already impressive power of the .45 used by this gun.

An illegal amount of stopping power delivered in a totally legal (if only because nobody thought to criminalize it) manner.


In all other ways? It's a pretty lackluster gun. And only viable because it's effectively two Colt 1911s welded together.

More kick and thus less control (though the 1911 is a masterpiece, so it can afford it), and both ejecting and reloading the clip is a mess that'll cost you precious seconds compared to standard clips.

Also, the standard firearm maintenance routine is more of a pain, and I wouldn't expect it to keep the 1911's reliability over the long term.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I feel like this is correct only in theory. In practice, unless you're less than five feet away from the target... the bullets aren't going to hit the same place. And the accuracy is probably going to be pretty shitty in general. The minuscule differences in powder amount, barrel shape, etc. are going to make them leave the barrel at slightly different times, and the kick means your hand isn't going to be steady between those two times.

Even if they DO travel along the same path, they're not going to be perfectly even, and their wakes will likely seriously fuck with each-other- assuming they don't veer in each-other's direction and bounce off.

Nice idea, only viable as a technical melee weapon, I think. Would be good as a holdout if you were say, killing animals that tend to survive the first bullet and you have to execute them when you get close and realize they aren't dead. But against someone else with a gun, at a distance? Probably useless.
 
Scygnus said:
Nice idea, only viable as a technical melee weapon, I think. Would be good as a holdout if you were say, killing animals that tend to survive the first bullet and you have to execute them when you get close and realize they aren't dead. But against someone else with a gun, at a distance? Probably useless.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Another very informative reply! However, the idea was come up with by the same guy who designed this:

image.png

I don't think usefulness was the first thing on his mind.
 
Scygnus said:
I feel like this is correct only in theory. In practice, unless you're less than five feet away from the target... the bullets aren't going to hit the same place. And the accuracy is probably going to be pretty shitty in general.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Sorry, you're wrong. Or at least greatly overestimating the impact of those forces in such a short frame of time.

- YouTube

Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

4:45 for the first clear and easily visualized example. Bit more than five feet, I'd say. And the two bullets strike within inches of each other.

There are plenty more there, this guy knows what he's doing.


So looks solid enough in practice. Still, other than 'punch a hole through body armor' or 'look really cool', there's nothing here that the standard 1911 isn't going to do better.

And honestly, the 1911 isn't exactly a bad looking gun regardless.
 
Last edited:
MadGreenSon said:
Anyone know stuff about guns?

Was this made just because it's bitchin' or what?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Basically the first one. Small arms that consist of at least two of the same repeating firearms (independent magazine, chamber, and barrel assembly) slaved either to the same trigger or independent ones have a long pedigree (the first I can remember was Italian and served in WW1)
It's most commonly employed on heavy weapons (e.g. light machine guns and heavier) because the increase in hit probability for two barrels firing at the same time on a handgun or rifle don't outweigh the increase in size, weight, mechanical complexity, and felt recoil. (There were a whole bunch of experiments in USA, USSR, and Israel on multibarreled assault rifles which went nowhere. In USA, there are assorted multibarrel firearms including the above, which remain niche products for the same reason)
 
TanaNari said:
There are plenty more there, this guy knows what he's doing.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
When he was shooting at the gong it looked like the spread was super variable. Some were pretty far apart and at least one volley was practically touching, side-by-side. With the closer targets it looked pretty side-by-side all the way.
 
Kendrick dropped.

Those poor Genius.com writers...
 
TanaNari said:
Depending on how you look at it, it was either made because it was bitchin', or it was made to circumvent several major gun laws.

Most notably, the laws against high power and/or armor piercing ammunition.

Now, I'm sure you're wondering, how does this do that? Well, the thing about most second chance armor is that it is second chance armor.

It will (probably) eat one hit of standard (civilian-legal) ammunition up to 9mm*, at the cost of the integrity of everywhere within a foot or so of impact. Any other bullets that hit that area will (probably) penetrate.

*As opposed to 50cal rounds, which don't even need to pierce the armor to kill you.

Very few people have the accuracy to hit the same point twice. This gun? Does it for you. And since the two bullets run tandem, they'll hit within microseconds of one another, thus effectively doubling the already impressive power of the .45 used by this gun.

An illegal amount of stopping power delivered in a totally legal (if only because nobody thought to criminalize it) manner.


In all other ways? It's a pretty lackluster gun. And only viable because it's effectively two Colt 1911s welded together.

More kick and thus less control (though the 1911 is a masterpiece, so it can afford it), and both ejecting and reloading the clip is a mess that'll cost you precious seconds compared to standard clips.

Also, the standard firearm maintenance routine is more of a pain, and I wouldn't expect it to keep the 1911's reliability over the long term.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
No, there are a couple of points here which are misconstrued for how laws work

45ACP is a relatively slow moving cartridge, therefore its not an armor piercing cartridge the typically european bans on 45 are because its a service cartridge (i.e. was in military use) and most of those infringements have largely been abolished the arsenal like most modern shotguns using two barrels is specifically built for two triggers b ecause shotguns were getting dinged by the strict application of the ATF of the NFA on what a trigger pull is supposed to do even though that was never intended to apply to sporting shotguns at the time it was written it was happenstance (here the triggers are paired together but are mechanically separate entities under the law)

The arsenal was made solely for rule of cool bragging rights of look we made a thing guys aren't we awesome
 
Last edited:
TanaNari said:
I never said the .45 ACP was armor-piercing.

In fact, I don't know how anything you said even applies to anything I said.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I was tired, and I misconstrued the second line of the post and then didn't process the sentence that followed it and misunderstood your post as imply that 45acp would somehow runafoul of armor piercing pistol ammunition restrictions via a common misunderstanding of how those laws are written
 
Imperator Pax said:
I was tired
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Fair enough.

Honestly, I don't know much about the laws on firearms in Europe. What with being an American and all. I'm aware Western Europe tends to have far more restrictive gun laws than the USA, and that's about it.

And here, the ammo restrictions are predominately of the 'modified' munitions. Hollow point, steel jackets, and so forth. The ones that greatly ramp up lethality against (possibly armored) human targets.
 
Radio Graffiti. If you know, you know.
 
Since the West looks to be cranking out a lot of their own "Progression Fantasy" like Korea, China and Japan have been doing

How long till those books get more regular comic adaptations?

Because frankly, even a single chapter/issue can take months unless it's from an American Comicbook company where it's at most 20 pages per issue, most of which are lackluster

I think they'll be using AI generated assets and/od tracing over them if so, kinda like how Korean WebToons are so easy to mass produce because they're skipping out on so much drawing via assets that were bought
 
SuperPulp2789 said:
Since the West looks to be cranking out a lot of their own "Progression Fantasy" like Korea, China and Japan have been doing

How long till those books get more regular comic adaptations?

Because frankly, even a single chapter/issue can take months unless it's from an American Comicbook company where it's at most 20 pages per issue, most of which are lackluster

I think they'll be using AI generated assets and/od tracing over them if so, kinda like how Korean WebToons are so easy to mass produce because they're skipping out on so much drawing via assets that were bought
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Not sure it'll ever really happen. Webcomics maybe, but western comics don't seem to adapt from novels very much if ever. The most you get is specifically companies that own an IP getting graphic novels made.
 
SuperPulp2789 said:
Since the West looks to be cranking out a lot of their own "Progression Fantasy" like Korea, China and Japan have been doing
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

D&D came from the West.

All these progression fantasies are just adaptations of D&D tropes.

It's weird to see someone talking about the West appropriating from shit that originated in the West, like it should feel bad for copying its own homework.
 
R.A.G. said:
Not sure it'll ever really happen. Webcomics maybe, but western comics don't seem to adapt from novels very much if ever. The most you get is specifically companies that own an IP getting graphic novels made.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Western Webtoons then….I think lots of those indie comic guys will have to "downgrade", but it'll be for the better


evildice said:
D&D came from the West.

All these progression fantasies are just adaptations of D&D tropes.

It's weird to see someone talking about the West appropriating from shit that originated in the West, like it should feel bad for copying its own homework.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

TBF, I am not sure how much Japan, Korea and China even play Tabletop Gaming
 
SuperPulp2789 said:
TBF, I am not sure how much Japan, Korea and China even play Tabletop Gaming
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Japan? A lot.

A lot a lot.

Or at least their game designers did.

Every JRPG from the early 80s to mid 90s was built entirely off of D&D. To the point where several dozen notable monsters had to be renamed for copyright reasons in the American release.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Back
Top