• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Sengoku Komachi Kurou Tan, European slavery

Mr Zoat

Dedicated ragequitter
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
17,636
Likes received
922,318
I've been reading Sengoku Komachi Kurou Tan! (The Hardships of a Warring States Era Beauty), and while I don't know enough about Japanese history to critique that part of it, I was extremely surprised that the main character was able to buy ethnically European slaves from a European merchant in 1573. I could see her being able to do it is the merchant was an Arab, but I was fairly sure that we didn't really have slavery in Europe at that time. Have I missed something important about European history?
 
Debt bondage and debt-slavery existed up until the 18th century in europe, as did the slavery of non-christians, pagans and heretics, many of whorm were ethnically european. That's my understanding at any rate.

This isn't taking into account all the various grey-area workarounds either, let alone the *actual* black market.

Official, mass-market slavery of non-criminal christians was technically illegal, but that's about as far as protections went.

I'm not surprised that Shizuko was able to buy a few european slaves. That the merchant is also european only makes sense. He'd have the connections and the routes and access to the 'merchandise'.
 
Last edited:
The slave trader in the comic says that of the two men, one was convicted of preaching heliocentrism and the other of iconclasm. Given that the Pope was familiar with Copernicus's work and Copernicus never got arrested, and Galileo mostly got imprisoned for being an unlikeable argumentative arsehole, the first one seems unlikely. I am not aware of restrictions on religious art during that period, though I suppose he might have gotten in trouble if it was something insulting. Of the two women, one got enslaved for criticising the church and the other for being a bastard. Given that this was during the start of the Reformation I could see a Catholic ruler signing off on a Protestant being enslaved -and vice versa- but I don't think being a bastard ever got you enslaved.

Also, the slave trader says that they were all originally sentenced to be burned at the stake, which seems even more unlikely.
 
The slave trader in the comic says that of the two men, one was convicted of preaching heliocentrism and the other of iconclasm. Given that the Pope was familiar with Copernicus's work and Copernicus never got arrested, and Galileo mostly got imprisoned for being an unlikeable argumentative arsehole, the first one seems unlikely. I am not aware of restrictions on religious art during that period, though I suppose he might have gotten in trouble if it was something insulting. Of the two women, one got enslaved for criticising the church and the other for being a bastard. Given that this was during the start of the Reformation I could see a Catholic ruler signing off on a Protestant being enslaved -and vice versa- but I don't think being a bastard ever got you enslaved.

Also, the slave trader says that they were all originally sentenced to be burned at the stake, which seems even more unlikely.

Selling off your bastards would be an easy way to get them out of sight and out of mind. I can't imagine it didn't happen. I can't comment on the stake burning, only that slavery was alive and well in europe in the 16th century.
 
Also, keep on mind this can also be a case of the author being wrong here. Wouldn't be the first japanese author getting things wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top